Your vision

This online discussion forum has concluded. You can still browse the site but the discussion area will no longer accept new comments or votes.

by Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority 20 Jul 2009, 8:42am

Tell us what your vision is for White Bay Power Station in the future. 

This online discussion forum has concluded. You can still browse the site but the discussion area will no longer accept new comments or votes.

Comments (45) Expand All Replies

Maxwell28 Comment 1 20 Jul 2009, 3:50 PM

Demolish the external structures including stacks and coal conveyors (which will fall down shortly anyway) and refurbish the existing turbine halls for use as a TAFE facility-the area has great public transport (particularly if a ferry wharf was built) and a TAFE facility would provide both employment and training opportunities on a large scale to the area. New external buildings would also probably be required for such a facility. The TAFE could possibly specialise in marine trades and associated qualifications which would give a local flavour.

The power station has been left to crumble over the past thirty years- development needs to start soon or total demolition will be the only option.

bertybear Comment 1.1 25 Jul 2009, 12:44 PM

I agree except for demolishing the stacks etc they are an integral part of the industrial heritage.

Starwars Comment 1.2 6 Aug 2009, 8:06 AM

Maritime TAFE is a great idea, and a working harbour outcome, Bailieys fuel is a solid start.

Need To grow recreational Boating in the precinct quickly.

Seems Govt understand 92% of boats registered in NSW are under 6 metres, So clearly them message that Labour People love to go Boating is sinking in.

Just think ho nice it will be to let these small boat owners a faciltiy

mickomorrison Comment 1.3 7 Aug 2009, 2:42 PM

TAFE good idea but knocking things down would be a shame. Im sure our engineers can find a way to improve structural integrity.

eyred Comment 2 20 Jul 2009, 4:38 PM

This is the perfect site for a combined renewable energy R&D centre and museum facility - a bit like Redfern Technology Park but dedicated to renewable energy.

The facility would contain -

1) examples and displays explaining coal fired technology and how the old plant worked.

2) displays documenting Australia's renewable technology pioneers and current projects

3) state of the art laboratories and office space for renewable energy scientists and entrepeneurs.

This could be a major educational and tourist attraction as well as a powerful statement of support for our world leading renewable energy scientists.

Naturally, the complex would be solar powered...

David Eyre

Starwars Comment 2.1 6 Aug 2009, 8:08 AM

As long as access to the Water Access is incorporated for ALL boat owners expecially small boaters

eyred Comment 2.2 7 Aug 2009, 2:01 PM

To clarify, this proposal would involved retaining significant parts of the existing building - for example the boiler rooms and control rooms, which are very impressive.

There aren't too many places in the world where you can view energy generation technology (old and new), so it would be a tourism draw card.

muirss01 Comment 3 20 Jul 2009, 8:14 PM

I agree with David Eyre, and I hope these comments build on his concept. I have heard a lot of views over the years on White Bay Power Station. The idea that I like the most is a World Class Environment and Sustainability Centre. The major functions of the centre would be to assist in the education of environmental and sustainability practices relevant to all sectors of the community, large corporations, local councils, small business and the individual households. The centre would cover the following key areas but is not limited too and would change in time.

1) Air and more…

 

eyred Comment 3.1 7 Aug 2009, 3:09 PM

A great vision! Bring it on!

bobrail Comment 4 20 Jul 2009, 9:39 PM

I like all the above suggestions.

I think that the whole development should take place on sustainable principles, and that this should include local power generation, waste disposal and water use/reuse.

My understanding is that power from waste no longer necessarily means burning it, and that there are "bio-reactors" and other fancy methods that can keep these things local yet viable.

I am sure the Power Station could form a part of those process. Presumably the local electricity supply infrastructure goes via the building anyway, and it's low lying location must make it ideal for water capture and treatment.

uNREESonable Comment 5 21 Jul 2009, 4:31 PM

This dreadful Rees government should not be let anywhere near this project. It will end up in the hands of one of their many donor contractors and we will end up with yet another disaster presided over by their Minister for Planning.

Lytton Comment 5.1 23 Jul 2009, 10:12 AM

Having a dig at Rees is like shooting fish in a barrel. But the website clearly says that all the land is owned by the State Government, so the idea that the State Government should have nothing to do with it is nonsense. How about a suggestion that might move things forward?

Maggie Comment 6 22 Jul 2009, 4:17 PM

I believe the buildings and grounds need to be preserved. I am concerned that any "new" development in the grounds will detract from the overall impact. A ferry wharf is an excellent idea as it will facilitate tourist visits from Sydney. Use of the part of the structure not required to be preserved needs to be sustainable, so that the Power Station becomes a living part of the community again.

Philippe Comment 7 22 Jul 2009, 6:41 PM

Bulldoze it and use the space for some much needed parkland.

RJE Comment 7.1 23 Jul 2009, 11:06 AM

Give it to Leichhardt Council for a peppercorn lease as at Callan Park. Then they can sit on it and do NOTHING but play politics, like at Callan Park

Then you will get another big "much needed park" Phillippe, and yes I am joking...

jad Comment 8 22 Jul 2009, 9:49 PM

The White Bay power station NEEDS to be maintained and should be converted into a mass solar generating plant of some sort (as i've mentioned else where, I have no idea how this will look or work its just a concept). Parts of it could be tastefully re-cladded with modern facade elements to reflect some of OUR architectural era.

The Whitebay power station would call for a great shopping experience similar to Melbourne central's incorporation of the 50metre brick stack/shot tower.

glc Comment 8.1 27 Jul 2009, 5:53 PM

Solar needs lots of sun and lots of area - White Bay is probably not the right place for a solar plant.

I like the shopping idea though.

RJE Comment 9 23 Jul 2009, 11:24 AM

Its a big, cumbersome but strangely beautiful building, and I’m very fond of it. I hope something can be worked out. Here goes...

Incorporate the new White Bay Metro station inside, then –

1. Make it into a transport museum – for trains (there’s a fabulous example in Broken Hill) and buses and trams. Last I heard the bus museum at Tempe was looking for a new home.

2. Incorporate retail concepts to suit museum visitors, tourists and commuters using the Metro.

3. Its still to big to use economically, so some cross subsidy will be needed. Housing isn’t such a bad option, if the developers design new additional structures to fit with the concept. ie. industrial style waterfront warehouse apartments. Considering the price similiar chic conversions all over the world attract, this should generate enough income for the project.

The key is DESIGN. If it looks good, attracts interest and money, the locals will go along with it. There will always be a noisy minority who oppose everything, but they are all voting Green anyway. Ignore them Minister Keneally and do something that will benefit eveyone!

ps. I do live locally, and am NOT petrified of “development” or change.

MattB Comment 10 23 Jul 2009, 6:54 PM

If a building is ugly it's ugly. If a building is old and ugly it's still ugly.

Just bulldoze it. Those stacks ruin my sunsets!

Russell Comment 10.1 25 Jul 2009, 9:47 AM

"ugly"? Hmmm... I remember a time when the QVB was considered "ugly" too MattB

Are you really only interested in your own visual aesthetics and residential amenity?

Is that why you are all over this forum, in every category pushing the same self-interested barrow?

Heritage is everything about our past, including the working class bit. Not to everyone's taste, I do understand that. But it's sad that you can't see the integrity and beauty of that building.

Thankfully many in the community do, and will contribute positively to this forum.

wk. Comment 11 24 Jul 2009, 2:34 PM

perhaps demolish some of the external structures such as the coal conveyers. Then incorperate it into a new, bigger fish market.

I really like what they have done at blaxland park.

BDon Comment 11.1 18 Aug 2009, 11:44 PM

I think the Fish Market is fine as is in the current location, and Pyrmont is already well known for the Fish Market...

I prefer the earlier ideas about doing something NEW with the area such as Metro sation/museum or maritime TAFE...Something Sydney doesn't already have :)

Russell Comment 12 25 Jul 2009, 9:34 AM

I wonder if that pile of rubble, the old White Bay Hotel, is anyone’s “vision” for the future?

Unfortunately, I think it might be.

Just before it burnt down, the owner had a DA knocked back for a commercial hospitality business. I was told that the rejection was because of “resident’s concerns.”

If a modest venture like that is rejected on the basis of a tiny few local’s objections, and the Government is so terrified of loosing the seat of Balmian that it responds to the wishes of a minority of propertied interests, then NOTHING can ever happen to that Power Station.

It will more…

 

adros47 Comment 12.1 17 Aug 2009, 1:39 PM

I'm also getting a bit PO'd with the council fiercely opposing any development that benefits the residents of greater Sydney but causes a couple of months of local inconvenience. I think the councils need to take a good look at what the locals are saying - many are supportive of large state projects in the area. Don't just oppose major works to be seen to be doing something!

Russell Comment 13 25 Jul 2009, 10:10 AM

Just expanding on the above (I left it too long for the software to cope with an edit!), some residential, commercial and retail should all be incorporated. It should also be a public transport hub, housing the new Metro and/or Light Rail and ferry/bus of course.

A lot of people are worried about how the Tigers site further up the road will cope with being such a hub. The Power Station is more strategically located.

And any re-use has to incorporate some adaptive, sympathetic treatment of its structure. While it generated power for us, it played a huge part in making us a wealthy society. We have to respect that, and play homage in some way (eg museum etc). To me it's a cathedral to our prosperity.

Preserving its aesthetics would also mark respect for Balmain's working class history. There's precious little of that left, but I am proud of that past.

BDon Comment 13.1 18 Aug 2009, 11:49 PM

Excellent idea, a kind of Inner West transport interchange! Perhaps could incorporate this with earlier ideas such as a Ferry Wharf and some kind of transport museum...

It could be a spot that is not only useful for locals and tourists but an interesting place to visit (a reason in itself to go there)...not to mention something to do while you're waiting half an hour for those rubbish buses from Victoria road :D

Sue Comment 14 25 Jul 2009, 6:18 PM

I strongly disagree with those who want to bulldoze it!

Even though re-use might be difficult and expensive, it is too valuable to let it rot, as (shamefully) it has for many years.

Retail, commercial, residential, cultural, environmental, all are possible, probably some combination of all. There is plenty of land there for further development (residential I hope) which are sympathetic to the area’s industrial flavour, AND have foreshore open space. It doesn’t have to be either/or, the way some people elsewhere have suggested.

I like the way the Walsh Bay finger wharf, the one they had to rebuilt, was designed to blend more…

 

KathM Comment 15 26 Jul 2009, 11:32 AM

Good points above (except those who want to destroy it!)

Its pretty obvious from my travels to other cities around the world that former docklands and industrial sites are popular with young residents, trendy shoppers and the uber-cool.

The important thing is design. It has to be done properly. Even though I was skeptical at first about what was happening at Birkenhead, its now shaping up quite nicely. If a developer there is willing to spend and invest, they will in White Bay, which has far more potential. And a Metro stop, please!

I see retail, residential and commercial space – marketed for cool, fashionable people. Like me of course! (only joking).

RichardK Comment 16 26 Jul 2009, 4:07 PM

I'm glad there is respect for this "ugly" building in most of these comments! I thought I was alone in liking it, I have heard mostly negative things over the years. But I was keen on the power station at Iron Cove (now Balmain Shores), which was a much more handsome, and re-usable, building.

But no one gave a fig about it in the late 80s and 90s, and look at the horrors that replaced it.

KathM (above) is on to something – industrial-chic is very fashionable and cool, all over the world. A developer may need some help, ie. support for a museum in part, or other cultural/community facilities incorporated into the retail, commercial and other uses. Hopefully it will all pan out better than at that farce – the Italian Forum in Leichhardt.

A Metro station is absolutely vital, that goes without saying.

Now lets do it.

nat Comment 17 27 Jul 2009, 1:05 PM

I'm pleased to see so many positive, constructive ideas. Good also that the nimbys and the tear-it-all-down and give us a park lot have stayed away for this forum.

A shame that politicians listen to them.

The building is a real challenge, that’s for sure! Its so big. I like what they have down in Brisbane to their power station on the river (art centre, theatre, cafe, cultural events), but it is a lot smaller and more manageable.

Some private sector involvement will be required at White Bay for retail and commercial development. But the core function should be like the one in more…

 

nat Comment 17.1 27 Jul 2009, 1:10 PM

Just an addition to the above: There may be dangers associated having developers involved, but its worth the risk, and maybe our only chance of getting anything at all.

For dangers, see Birkenhead. The old rubber factory has been gutted and the facade on the waterfront is about to fundamentally altered with some great glass shell. But at least the structure is in place, and the fine building is being re-used.

For success stories, Look at the QVB: It was once considered useless and ugly and would have been demolished. It is now one of Sydney’s most loved places, and a real triumph of our ingenuity. And the Walsh Bay wharves. Its a fantastic environment now, and all that developed while the docks were operating. Working harbour and other activities are a positive contribution to the urban vibe, not a problem.

Now lets do that at White Bay.

RichardK Comment 17.2 27 Jul 2009, 6:01 PM

Dunno about the ads Nat! But good stuff... For that wall, what about illuminated light-show art like that Brian Eno one at the Opera House recently? Make it a permanent feature. The MCA building looked fantastic during that festival with the lights.

BDon Comment 17.3 18 Aug 2009, 11:54 PM

I too love what they have done in Brisbane (I didn't even think of that - thanks!)

And think the outdoor cinema idea is FABULOUS! Good work :)

glc Comment 18 27 Jul 2009, 6:01 PM

Another example is London. Contrast the Tate Modern with Battersea Power Station - both old powerstations, one developed, one not. The Tate shows what can be done with a bit of thought and care, while Battersea is the perfect counter example.

Another thing to note - a major problem with old powerstations is asbestos contamination. The powerstation in Melbourne CBD cost about $17 million to remediate, and that's via knocking it down. Cleaning for reuse is more expensive.

Nic Comment 19 28 Jul 2009, 4:37 PM

As I have mentioned in one of the other forums I really like the building. I think it could be redeveloped as the cornerstone to the intersection between the White bay and Glebe Island areas.

My personal thoughts are to keep as much of the building intact as possible and clean it up. Then turn the inside into a mixed use space with shops, cafés, pubs, and a metro station. Surround it with some nice boardwalks, fountans and blend it through into some mixed use in both Glebe Island and White bay and the area would be really enjoyable to walk around.

Lutes Comment 20 29 Jul 2009, 2:33 PM

White Bay Powerstation is a remarkable site - so close to the CBD, right on the water, and it's a handsome "federation" building (as Power Stations go).

The most important thing about Sydney harbour foreshore use is that it is compatible with a working harbour. The immediate foreshore should be kept for commercial nautical use.

The rest - well it hasn't got great access as yet, but put it on the metro, build in a bus interchange, allow some car parking on site and you could do anything (other than retail, which I beleive is already adequately serviced elsewhere in Sydney) more…

 

Starwars Comment 21 4 Aug 2009, 8:14 AM

PULL it down, why keep it, the area, is well served with history of the past. It has no major good looks, its only an old power station. I France they pull down 14th Century Castles because their not old enough. In Sydney we was time effort and money, keeping an old ugly structure. Was it EVERY anything but ugly

mickomorrison Comment 22 7 Aug 2009, 3:04 PM

It is a Powerstation, so why not use it to generate Power!

Todays technology can provide us with quiet, clean gas fired turbines which could generate power for the City and create employment for local people (Like the ones put out of work when it closed).

Research and Development facility and museum also a great idea, incorporating both would be an interesting contrast.

For gods sake,please do NOT destroy this beautifully ugly piece of industrial history!

malcolmwilson Comment 23 8 Aug 2009, 1:19 AM

It's late at night, I'm feeling mellow and that's a recipe for typing way too much. Sorry if this appears long-winded...

Nice to scan everyone's views and great that the overriding opinion is to retain the power station. I've lived close to it from the days it last operated and I've done a complete 180 in favour of restoration and reinvention. Like me, some of you bloggers have been inside, seen the machinery that remains and been blown away by the sheer scale and height - equivalent to a 12 storey building. Built to power public transport (trams, trains too?), my more…

 

antkleve Comment 24 8 Aug 2009, 6:51 AM

Obviously keep the structure but agree that the stacks have to go. Just like the old brickworks in St Peters, they are nothing but an eyesore. The question is return on investment and how we can achieve this. There needs to be some kind of commercial aspect to it but the question is what sort of facility don't we have in the city at the moment. Just look at the wonderful restoration of the carriage works at Eveliegh as an example of how we can successfully restore our industrial heritage.

admin Comment 25 8 Aug 2009, 7:41 AM

SENT TO ADMINISTRATOR BY JOY

I suggest that the White Bay Power Station be redeveloped as a Cultural Centre with some car parking support as it is impossible to park in the area, including Rozelle and Balmain. I think a Cultural Centre is lacking in the inner west. This Cultural Centre could support an art gallery, an arts centre providing space for studios and tuition. The NSW Government should collaborate with the City of Sydney to achieve this Cultural Centre.

Russell Comment 26 9 Aug 2009, 4:52 PM

This has been a fabulous forum, and I’m really pleased to see so many others share my affection for this building. I hope and pray for a positive outcome and not, as I have feared especially since that mysterious fire, a pile of rubble. Malcolm’s words just above were particularly moving. Even if I could quibble with a few things he said, his sentiments were spot-on.

I’m right at the moment working on a piece about the Power Station and this consultation forum for the inner west publication I write for, and decided to re-read some of the entries. I’m sad to see the expiry date for comments is almost up. I have enjoyed it immensely.

I hope the State government is taking note of all the suggestions, and not just listening to the big money and the big political hard-nuts.

I guess that’s now up to all of us.

balmainiac Comment 27 16 Aug 2009, 4:09 PM

I wasn't born in Sydney, I chose this place to be my home. I guess that's why I don't agree with people who love eyesores just because "it's always been there" or because they've "grown fond of it".

I also can't see why some people dismiss everything that is commercial. Commercial business development is GOOD, not bad!!! Only businesses with their "selfish" interests will create (a) JOBS for us to live on, (b) SERVICE infrastructure for us to enjoy, (c) new, functional ARCHITECTURE for us to feel proud of, and (d) TAX REVENUES for all our 3 tiers of government.

A museum, or TAFE, or a Green Thinking Centre... which were all proposed in this forum, will do NONE of the GOOD things I listed above. So how can they make our lives any better???

But regarding the Power Station building... even though it is an industrial eyesore, it has a couple of original sections with ornamental brickwork, which are worth keeping and integrating in the new commercial developments. Maybe around 20% of the total elevation meterage, not more.

muirss01 Comment 27.1 18 Aug 2009, 9:05 PM

I agree with your comments around the importance of commercial business development and beleive this is a very important factor in the bays precinct development, I also beleive the ideas in this forum are great and can be a critical part of this solutiuon. For example the "Green Thinking Centre" that you have named it, if done incorporating all the great ideas above and retaining the heritage items of the site, will become a visitor attraction. This will bring people to the area and will help in the development and expansion of the whole green industry from R&D, to rollout more…

 

commonsense Comment 28 20 Aug 2009, 11:12 AM

Why celebrate the past industrial damage done to the area and all of our lives retaining and celebrating the remnants of the industrial vandals?

It's time for some truly visionary thinking that will contribute to the long term future of our city. This is a great opportunity to return the foreshore a more natural state that all can enjoy without celebrating our past mistakes.

ac4ef44399e0b645871569d7e1e2f83bf6a6755e